A high quality printer is a significant investment for an enthusiast photographer. They are a marvel of modern technology, but the pro-level wide-format printers needed to print on the larger roll paper stock are designed to be used in a print-every-day production environment. The infrequent use that is common among enthusiast photographers can result in clogged print heads that may require ink-wasting power cleaning cycles, or in the worst case, an expensive printer head replacement to remedy. ⇒
A quick note on a discovery I had this morning. I decided to bite the bullet and upgrade my old Quicken for Mac 2007 installation to the newish Quicken for Mac 2015. Paid for it, downloaded and installed it per the instructions. But as soon as I clicked on it, it would crash with an error message indicating that I did not have permission to create a folder in the Application Support directory.
Hmmm. This is strange. This is part of my user directory. Why the heck would I not have permission?
I’ll backtrack here. Early in the year, I migrated my whole system from a Retina MacBook Pro to my current MacPro 2015 desktop. I used Apple’s Migration Assistant to move all my applications and user files from the old system to the new. And I noticed that there were a handful of applications that no longer worked. One of them was CodeRunner, which is a great little program to try out little code snippets in a variety of programming languages. Anyhoo - it was annoying, but not something I had time to really track down and figure out.
So this morning’s experience with the new Quicken 2015 provided the impetus to figure out what the hell is going on.
The average Mac OSX user probably is not familiar with a lot of the directory structure of OSX. One confusing aspect of this is that there are multiple Library directories (folders). There is the system Library directory and the user Library folder. And the error message I was getting from Quicken seemed to indicate a problem with the user Library folder.
I opened a terminal window, and typed the following command:
The tilde (~) is a shorthand for the user’s home directory.
I then typed in
ls -ald App*
And to my surprise, this unix command listed the owner of my Application Support directory as wheel! The owner of this directory should have been my user id, not wheel.
The fix at this point was obvious - I needed to establish my user id as the correct owner of the Application Support directory.
I was already in the ~/Library directory, so all I had to do was use the unix chown command to change the owner of this directory to my user id.
sudo chown -R myuserid Application\ Support
And Quicken 2015 would finally launch. The side benefit to this was that now all my other balky apps began to work as well!
I guess the moral of this tale is that Migration Assistant can occasionally do some stupid things to ownerships and permissions during the migration process. If problems arise, the ~/Library directory a good place to begin looking for problems.
My posts lately have tended toward the computer-ish side of things, and this one will be no different. It will be brief and concise, to wit:
I realize that is the third time you have read this in the last 14 seconds, but there is the story behind it:
Most of us photographer types have a lot of data that needs to be stored digitally. The days of ring binders filled with plastic negative and slide sleeves are coming to a close. I still shoot a lot of film, but in just my casual, non-professional digital shooting over the last seven years, I have accumulated about 1 terabyte of digital images on my computer! Naturally, I don’t want to lose any of these photographs. So what is the best strategy for protecting them?
I’ll start by admitting that my job involves using seismic data for oil and gas exploration. We have HUGE amounts of data and interpretation that we need to access on high powered graphical workstations. What I have learned the hard way over the last thirty years are a few things:
It seems like every day I will see some offhand comment on a photography forum from someone who has just gotten a new RAID device (often a Drobo or Buffalo-type device) and that they can now breathe easy. Well, this is a misplaced sense of security. Here is the deal: A RAID device is only as good as the the piece of hardware or software that controls it. A RAID uses multiple drives and distributes the data among them in a systematic way. But the hardware or software controller is like the map. You lose the map, and your data is gone, and likely can only be recovered by some very pricey specialists who make quite a good living by being able to reconstruct your map. It is hugely complicated, and is akin to reconstructing a wine glass that has had an encounter with a concrete floor.
“Oh”, you say, “But I have RAID-5, and I can have one disk go bad and it will rebuild the data if I lose a disk”. Yep, it could work that way. Or not. That assumes the failure point is a bad disk. What if something else fails? Say, for instance, that you have a hardware based RAID-5 standalone box like the Mercury Elite QX-2, and have it configured in 3+1 mode, which means that it is RAID-5 and can reconstruct the data with the ‘hot spare’ if one of the primary disks goes down. What if the hardware/firmware inside the box goes bad? Where does that leave you? Up a foul-smelling estuary without means of locomotion. This isn’t a disk going bad, this is the hardware-controller having a brain aneurysm and not having any recollection of where it left the car keys.
This happened to me about three weeks ago. No disk failures. Just a hardware failure at a level above the disks. Did I freak out? No, because now I don’t trust anything, and I had two spare copies of that data off site and one live copy on-site that is cloned once a day. I just packed up the box and sent it back for a replacement. But the moral is: Don’t trust a RAID as a backup. The only safety you have is many copies of your data in many different places. And for backup purposes, I would prefer two or three copies on high capacity single drives over a RAID anyday.
Another lesson I learned is not to rely on a piece of software to automatically backup your data. You need to have a method of confirming that the backup took place. I like to use Carbon Copy Cloner for my mac, and I have it send me an email when a backup starts and when it finishes. I also have it use the Growl notification windows to tell me the same thing. If I get up in the morning and I don’t have matching pairs of Growl notifiers on my screen when I log in, I know there is a problem.
Trust, but verify, in short. I learned this the hard way last spring when my backup software failed to run for two weeks and then my system disk went bad. I was all smug that I had a live clone, and then horrified to find out that it was two weeks out of date because Super-Duper software hiccuped and stopped backing up. I hadn’t set all the notification routines in place that I have currently, and I had no clue there was a problem. I switched to Carbon Copy Cloner, and so far (fingers crossed) I have not had a problem.
And while I am on the subject of Carbon Copy Cloner, I want to emphasize that this is a replication method, not a true backup. All the software does is ensure that the files on one piece of hardware are duplicated onto another. If you have a major screwup on the parent copy, all the cloning does is to ensure that you have the same screwup written to your child copy. Backup software like Time Machine allows you to store incremental copies of your data, and if you decide you want to go back to the work you had a week ago, it will make that possible. A replication approach will merely allow you to go back to the most recent copied version, and that is it.
So here are a few pieces of advice: